Occurred on: Wednesday, January 29, 2020
View Slides (pdf), Watch on YouTube
Experts who conduct alternatives assessment often face the serious challenge of how to adequately characterize a hazard when critical toxicity data are missing for a specific chemical. To solve this problem, interest is growing around the application of new approach methods (NAMs), utilizing non-animal tests as an effective means to fill these data gaps. Over the last decade, significant investments have been made in the development of NAMs. However, are these methods ready for use in alternative assessments? Are there alternative test methods that can be reliably used to fill certain hazard data gaps in both informed substitution and product development contexts? If so, for what endpoints? What are some of the current strategies being used to incorporate NAMs into chemical hazard assessments? The Association for the Advancement of Alternatives Assessment’s (A4) winter 2020 webinar, How to Get to Safer Alternatives Using Non-Animal Testing Methods will explore these questions and more. Please join us.
Amy Clippinger |
Pamela Spencer |
Featured Respondents:
Lauren HeineDirector of Safer Materials & Data Integrity at ChemFORWARD |
Shari FranjevicGreenScreen® Program Manager at Clean Production Action |
EPA’s New Approach Methodologies web page
US Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods: A Strategic Roadmap for Establishing New Approaches to Evaluate the Safety of Chemicals and Medical Products in the United States
Malloy et al. Advancing Alternatives Analysis: The Role of Predictive Toxicology in selecting safer chemical products and processes. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Sep;13(5):915-925.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management Journal's podcast on the Malloy et al. article
Alternative Methods Accepted by US Agencies by National Toxicology Program; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Alternative Methods Validated For Regulatory Use by PETA INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE CONSORTIUM LTD.